‘The Maggie’ (1954) is a well loved Ealing film, a gentle comedy set on the waterways around the west coast of
. The Maggie of the film
title is a battered old puffer boat, whose wily captain returns to Scotland in search of a cargo.
By being in the right place at the right time, and with a little
stretching of the truth, Captain MacTaggart makes a scoop. He secures the cargo of a wealthy American transport
tycoon called Calvin D Marshall. His job
is to take several household items to an island. The job is given to Captain MacTaggart by Glasgow ’s assistant, the very English beaurocrat Mr Pusey who is too
busy to make the proper checks. The
Captain being a law unto himself, the journey is punctuated by booze ups and
poaching, and the journey promises to be a long one. Marshall , finding out about his cargo, firstly tries to send his
assistant to sort things out, but then ends up joining the crew to supervise
matters. All sorts of little adventures
ensue which are delightfully entertaining – perfect feelgood stuff for a wet
weekend afternoon. Marshall
As I have mentioned before, most recently in my post about ‘The Man in the White Suit’, I often detect a hint of political commentary in the Ealing comedies. In ‘The Maggie’ I think that the key to the commentary lies in the name of the wealthy American – Marshall. At this point in the mid 1950s, Marshall Aid would still have been a relevant topic. This pumping of
wealth into United
States Europe aimed to put us back on our feet economically – the ultimate
capitalist plan to prevent communist revolution or further war. received a hefty share of Marshall Aid, but as we can still
easily imagine today, people must have had their own ideas on how it should
have been spent. I think that the naming
of a rich American character as Britain is too much of a coincidence for it not to have been
The big mistake that Donovan Marshall makes is to leave the arrangements for the transportation of his goods to an Englishman in a bowler hat. It is he that messes up what should be a simple task of distributing the goods to their intended destination. He fails to make the proper checks and is panicked into giving the shipping contract to the wrong sort of people. Does this translate into dissatisfaction with how the
government spent the Marshall Aid? There has certainly been
discussion amongst history commentators on this issue. Westminster invested their aid into manufacturing and soon outstripped the
Germany in this respect. Meanwhile,
it seems that the UK chose to spend much of its aid money on the welfare state and
clinging to the wreckage of colonialism.
Is this the reason why we have bowler-hatted and suited Mr Pusey
misdirecting Mr Marshall’s riches? I do
believe that someone involved with the making of ‘The Maggie’ was bemoaning a
perceived condemnation to a second rate future because of mishandled aid money. UK
One scene in the film which really caught my eye was close to the end, when Mr Marshall’s cargo is jettisoned in order to save The Maggie from sinking. There is a lingering shot of a crate sinking to the sea bed. A drop in the ocean is the phrase that came to mind. An opinion that we just didn’t receive enough?
At the close of the film,
lets MacTaggart get away with it all and keep his puffer,
sacrificing his expensive cargo in the process.
I wondered if this was a criticism of the Marshall too, in being too soft with US . Is this a suggestion
that they let sentimentality get in the way of making us treat capitalism with
the due reverence? Britain
None of this proves anything; it is all my own conjecture. But I find the possibility that such a gentle film as The Maggie could be making such a political comment fascinating. This is a subtlety which is definitely lacking in modern media.