‘Doctor in Love’ (1960) is
one of quite a lengthy series of films, obviously trying to emulate the success
of the Carry ons. The formula is similar – a slightly saucy romp through a
series of medical jokes and puns featuring a host of familiar faces – often
recognisable from the Carry ons too. Regulars included James Robertson Justice as
the top brass doctor, his most famous and enduring role.
JRJ by @aitchteee http://www.etsy.com/shop/Tayloredartprints |
Dirk Bogarde often took the
lead role as the newly qualified doctor, but in ‘Doctor in Love’ he is replaced
by the lesser known Michael Craig. He is
supported by Leslie Phillips, Liz Frazer and Joan Sims with a delightful cameo
from Esma Cannon to up the Carry on stakes. Look out too for a very youthful
Peter Sallis – yes he was young once!
The Doctor series are a
lesson on how to piggy back on the success of another. ‘Doctor in Love’ meanwhile features a small
lesson on the history of medical research in the UK. In order to buy themselves some time, Craig
and Phillips’ characters (Burke and Hare) book themselves in at Foulness cold
research centre. This is where they bump
into Frazer and Sims – also buying time after having lost their jobs as
strippers. The new intake is paired off
and they are given strict instructions to stay isolated in their pairing while
they are being exposed to cold viruses.
This seems to be an odd way to spend your free time, but it certainly
isn’t pure fantasy.
I was aware of the post-war
common cold research establishment in Wiltshire. A look at papers on the Wellcome Library
website
(http://blog.wellcomelibrary.org/2013/09/fighting-the-cold-war-david-tyrrell-and-the-common-cold/) and a Pathe newsreel from the 1950s (http://www.britishpathe.com/video/common-cold-research-unit-salisbury) confirmed that the Doctor storyline is
surprisingly accurate for what could be viewed as a rather frivolous film. Because taking part in the research involved
food and shelter for a fortnight, with a small amount of pay into the bargain,
it seems that there was no shortage of takers, even an over-subscription. There was some marketing of the scheme as an
unusual and cheap way to take a holiday and the Wellcome paper even refers to
couples honeymooning there. It is easy
to see how people might have used it to plug the gap between jobs. On arrival, people were split into pairs and
were not allowed physical contact with anyone else for purposes of controlling
the research. There are however tales of
patients taking a liking to each other and communicating by telephone or
shouting! Not quite as cheeky as Burke
and Hare’s methods. The research establishment was housed in a former wartime
Red Cross Hospital and the film also seems to have chosen a true to life
location. Those semi circular corrugated
huts so commonly used in wartime camps are shown in the background. So, full marks to ‘Doctor in Love’ for
showing us this little bit of our medical history. One that seems to have failed in its
task. Viewed from the present it does
all seem to have been a tremendous waste of time and money – though obviously
not for some of the individuals involved.
Another surprisingly good
word for ‘Doctor in Love’ is its treatment of the lady doctor, played by
Virginia Maskell. I have observed that
in the earlier Carry on films, female medical staff are of two types: the
doe-eyed siren with designs on a doctor, or the hatchet-faced harridan.* Here,
Dr Barrington is none of these – she is intelligent, wise and stylish. Those who would see her as anything other
than a competent doctor are portrayed as buffoons. An excellent piece of forward thinking for
its time.
* In my essay Carry on NHS,
available in my Kindle book ‘Matinee Musings’ - www.amazon.co.uk/Matinee-Musings-The-History-Usherette-ebook/dp/B00FJ4KY6C