A few blog
posts ago, I mentioned how much I enjoy Stanley Holloway’s performance in
‘Brief Encounter.’ Stanley and trains go
well together, it would seem, as another iconic railway film also features him
in fine fettle. Of course, I’m referring
to ‘The Titfield Thunderbolt’ (1953).
Trains are an
incidental feature of ‘Brief Encounter’, but the railway takes centre stage in
the ‘Thunderbolt’. The setting is
idyllic – the English countryside at the height of summer. I’m a confirmed atheist/pessimist, but if
anyone ever mentions heaven, this is the sort of mental picture that appears in
my mind. A small branch line with an
engine and a couple of dusty carriages meandering through small honey coloured
villages and riotous meadows. And if you
were in need of company along this eternal journey, well you could do a lot
worse than Stanley’s half-cut-happy-go-lucky chap. In fact, any of the Titfielders would make
for an interesting companion.
The story, if
there does happen to be anyone at all out there new to this film, involves the
villagers of Titfield joining together to save their branch line railway. When the closure is announced by poster on
the station, there is much distress about the fate of the village – in fact
only the local bus company are pleased with the impending axe. The bus contingent is very much cast as the
baddies of the piece. With the local
vicar (literally) driving forward a community-run railway there is a religious
element to the film. The clear cut battle
between good and bad; the sermon from John Gregson as the squire as to why the
railway needs to be in their lives; the penniless hermit who gives up all he
owns to the cause when the original rolling stock is ruined and the redemption
of the alcoholic Holloway as the saviour of the line. During the crucial timed run along the line
with the officials on board the train – who are to determine if the trains can
continue running under local steam – the carriages become uncoupled from the
engine. As everyone rallies round to
quietly push the carriages along, there is something almost spiritual about the
scene. Perhaps this heaven thing going
on in my head is not entirely coincidental.
This theme of
a community joining together to deliver an important service should be fairly
familiar to British people at the moment.
Especially if, like me, you work in the charity/voluntary sector. The term “Big Society” fills myself and my
colleagues within the sector with rage and frustration. To briefly explain, some
Eton/Oxbridge-educated-ivory-tower-dwelling nit thought it would be a good idea
to get local services delivered for “nothing” by getting local people to do it
themselves. A common example, much discussed,
are local library services. Many
branches are closing, and those in the community bewailing the loss are being
told that they can keep it open, if they run it themselves. For nothing.
It’s a bit like volunteering, only with paid professional workers being
made redundant, their qualifications and experience being devalued, along with
the whole concept of volunteering.
Volunteering is meant to be an add-on, not a necessity. Meanwhile, I see voluntary and community
organisations all around me going to the wall, and old colleagues and friends
being made redundant or having their hours cut.
Funding has dried up, because apparently we’re all in this together and
so the services that we deliver should be cut back. Need any advice, counselling or support
because life has dealt you a cruel blow and you don’t have an old boys network
to fall back on? Good luck. Let me know if you find it. In a nutshell, we have been told that the
community needs to start delivering its own services, but there’s no money to
be had to do this. But there are always
costs to services.
And this is where
‘The Titfield Thunderbolt’ comes undone as a believable story for me these
days. It’s interesting to see that community-run services as an idea go way
back, but look closely at it and it appears to be an unsustainable operation. The vicar (and his friend the Bishop) are the
only local people actually able to drive an engine. So what happens when they are unable to do
so? Properly trained and qualified staff
are needed. Who maintains the rolling
stock? What about track maintenance?
Really, it’s an accident waiting to happen. Can people be found to staff
the station at peak times, or are they all too busy getting themselves or their
families ready for work? I realise that
the very idea for the film was based on one of the heritage railways that were
being launched around the time. But a
heritage railway for tourists is different to a daily train service
specifically laid on to service a community.
It’s as much an unsubstantiated dream as heaven is…and the “Big
Society”. But the film is certainly a
lot more fun than the government’s hare-brained ideas.
No comments:
Post a Comment