‘Carry
on Nurse’ (1959), the second film in the series, is perhaps most well known for
that final scene with the daffodil thermometer.
I’ve always particularly enjoyed it for Charles Hawtrey’s performance as
the headphone- wearing radio addict. And
the priceless expression on his face as he slides himself into the role of an
illicit night nurse.
I
revisited ‘Carry on Nurse’ earlier this year in order to remind myself of some
references for a more in depth essay that I am preparing. Quite unexpectedly, I found myself wholly
identifying with a small, quite inconsequential scene that has recently taken
on relevance. Mr Hickson (Bill Owen) is
laid up in traction with a broken leg, after an accident at work. When visiting time comes around, we find Mrs
Hickson is pleasingly played by Irene Handl.
Those little tastes of Irene that we find in the 1950s are always
delicious. I think that she was at her
best in these small pieces, which leave us more satisfied than a whole film of
her might have done. Anyway she
dutifully visits her husband, and brings along with her a form that needs to be
completed in order for him to claim compensation. Although he has merely broken a leg, it is
Mrs Hickson that has to fill the form in – despite Mr Hickson holding all the
answers to many of the questions.
I found the scene funnier than I ever had before,
and not just because of Irene’s portrayal of her character. A close
friend of mine had only recently been telling me of a similar situation she had
found herself in twice over. The first time round her OH had broken his arm and
so quite naturally it was her that had had to fill in the insurance forms. But
now he had hit a spell of unemployment, and despite him being able bodied and
at a loose end, there was still an expectation that she should be the one who
completed the necessary forms! She's a working mum, she came home from
work and carried out many of her household chores (the washing machine
being as unfathomable as a female’s temperament...apparently) and did general
mum stuff, and yet it was still the assumption it was her job to fill in the
claim and job application forms! It became quite a contentious issue, and they
could easily have ended up as another divorce statistic.
So I found Mrs Hickson’s plight very funny – as my
friend said, quoting Morrissey, “I can smile about it now but at the time it
was terrible.” But with it came a realisation that it wasn’t just her that had
taken up with a big girls’ blouse where holding a pen is concerned. It
would appear from my own little straw poll that quite often, once a man has a
woman in his life, anything that involves writing is automatically allocated to
her. It can be forms, cheques or greetings cards. This may be more
of a traditional working classes thing. Those men who earn a living by
manual work are, I suppose, just not confident in their abilities where
literacy is concerned.
I
wonder how much 20th century education has been to blame for
this. Back in the days when it was
assumed that boys would go and work in the coal mine, steel works or foundry,
literacy just wasn’t top of the list of concerns. Not that long ago, a job in the pit was for
life. There would never be any need to
fill in another job application form.
Girls meanwhile would be the ones to work as secretaries; to write the
invites and thank you notes and letters to family. I hope that this is therefore a phenomenon
that is dying out under increasing educational expectations and changes to our
employment patterns. Or the realisation
that these days, everyone needs to know how to fill in a JSA form.
Matron! By @aitchteee |
No comments:
Post a Comment